TITLE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
| PhET Interactive Simulations |
http://phet.colorado.edu/en/research
The University of Colorado is leading the way in simulation and learning. See their research on learning
|
| The Center for Authentic Science Practice in Education |
Instrument Network Goals
- Provide Students with access to research-level instrumentation
- Allow for remote calibration and operation of instruments via the Internet
- Produce research-quality data
- Enable high sample throughput and Internet-based data archiving and retrieval
|
| Internet School Experimental System iSES |
|
| iLough-Lab at Loughborough University |
Housed within the Chemical Engineering Department.
See Publications link for articles.
|
| Virtual Labs (India) |
The Virtual Labs. See the 12 institutions participating in this nationwide project.
|
| Remotely Controlled Laboratories - RCLs |
Click English icon and RCLs menu.
Select an experiment, then click “Laboratories” and “Start experiment." Experiments are controllable without any registration.
|
| BugScope |
The Bugscope project provides free interactive access to a scanning electron microscope (SEM) so that students anywhere in the world can explore the microscopic world of insects. This educational outreach program from the Beckman Institute's Imaging Technology Group at the University of Illinois supports K-16 classrooms worldwide. |
|
RemoteLaboratory.com
Innovative Solutions for Online Learning
(read "About Remote Labs")
|
Mission: To promote world knowledge of science and engineering by leveraging the power of the Internet to increase accessibility and reduce barriers to education |
|
Nano4Me.org
(register to access the remote labs yourself!)
|
The Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge (NACK) Center was established at the Penn State College of Engineering in September 2008 through the National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technological Education program. |
| Australia’s Labshare |
Government sponsored project to develop a technical infrastructure and a sustainable organizational strategy that will supports ongoing sharing of remote laboratory facilities and resources. |
| NANSLO - BC Innovation Goes International |
A presentation given at the ETUG 2011 conference in Nelson, BC. |
| RWSL Promotional Videos |
North Island RWSL Promotional Videos
|
|
Web-based Associate of Science
Program Development Project
|
Chapter 9 of Moving the Laboratory Online, edited by Devon a. Cancilla and Simon P. Albon
|
| Overview of technical equipment used in RWSL experiments. |
|
Experimenting from a Distance:
Remotely Controlled Laboratory (RCL) |
Department of Physics, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, |
| Remote laboratories extending access to science and engineering curricular |
a Publication of The Open University |
| LiLa (Library of Labs) |
Eight European institutions and three companies collaborate in the sharing of remote and virtual labs. This link is to their research offerings. Explore and view their PPT introductionfor background. |
| A Practical Approach to Managing Online Experiments |
Berlin Institute of Technology, LiLa partner. Page 10 Student Evaluation of Remote Lab. |
| TU Berlin's Remote Farm |
After reading "A Practical Approach", explore the Berlin site. |
A Sloan Consortium webinar on Remote Access to Scientific Instrumentation and Online Labs for STEM (Science Technology Engineering Math)
|
Good webinar. There are slides indicating that student ratings of the course is high. Students repeated more experiments using the robotic labs. No examples of the robotics at work, however.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review |
"We observe that the boundaries among the three labs are blurred in the sense that most laboratories are mediated by computers, and that the psychology of presence may be as important as technology." |
| Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories |
"These knowledge scores were as high or higher (depending on topic) after performing remote and simulated laboratories versus performing hands-on laboratories."
|
Initial Design and Development of an Integrated Laboratory Network: A New Approach for the Use of Instrumentation in the Undergraduate Curriculum
|
|
|
Remote Instrumentation for the Teaching Laboratory
|
|
| An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratories |
"The results from this study indicated no significant difference in the educational outcomes between students who performed the in-person or the remote experiment."
|
| Lessons Learned from 10 Years Experience with Remote Laboratories |
Describes experiences with remotely-operated robotics and electronics labs in Australia. |
| Remote Instrumentation |
An early MIT paper outlining considerations
in use of remote instrumentation in undergraduate
education.
|
iLabs Around the World
|
MIT's iLabs partner sites
|
| The VISIR project – an Open Source Software Initiative for Distributed Online Laboratories |
Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH) in
Sweden |
Review of Literature on Remote and Web-based Science Labs
|
for BCCampus Articulation and Transfer of Remote and Web-based Science Lab Curriculum Project |
Comparing student performance: online versus blended versus face-to-face
|
Larson, D., & Sung, C-H. (2009). Comparing student performance: Online versus blended versus face-to-face.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42, April 2009. |
Comparison of Student and Instructor Perceptions of Best Practices
in Online Technology Courses
|
Batts, D. (2008). Comparison of student and instructor perceptions of best practices in online technology
courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 477-489. Retrieved from
http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/batts_1208.htm. |
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.